|
|
Post by karro on Aug 10, 2004 22:07:46 GMT -5
Explanations:
Shady's Records: the label of Eminem cause they tour with D-12 for Heart Attack
Nitro's Records: The Offsprings label. cause they toured with them in 2001
Island Records: cause they give good deals to bands and let them keep their integrality like for Thrice, Thursday. And they planned to tour with American Hi-Fi at some time..
Marveric Records: Madonna's own music label cause I know Nikola workship her. Who knows if she didnt send naked pics of her just like she did with Rancid? Will Nikola resist to?
Majors labels: cause they said it probably wont stay with BHR. So why regress on a smaller label when you already get the best indie?
BHR/Epitaph: they will finally realise that we are better to stay at parents home sometime. Outside can happen to be more hard...
Softcore Records: Sounds cool, eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chastity on Aug 10, 2004 23:06:37 GMT -5
If Softcore Records existed, I think that would be the most ideal record company for them. They would be able to call the shots and Millencolin makes good decisions with their own career so I would figure they would do the same with other bands. They probably won't come start a record company but I can definitely see Millencolin doing that kind of thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by karro on Aug 10, 2004 23:27:54 GMT -5
Yeah, it's why I voted that wise too. It seems to take so long to choose a deal. Its like nothing fit them. And they are too indie to jump tht easily on a major. i don,t know. All the cool stuffs they are doing for us like those studios vids. Those guys need their liberty, it's easy to understand it. Maybe they are now at the one point fat mike has been first...
|
|
|
|
Post by MrClean on Aug 10, 2004 23:45:31 GMT -5
I like of the BHR/Epitaph.
I think that they would have to continue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Renix on Aug 11, 2004 1:11:31 GMT -5
I think that Softcore records AB isn't a good idea 'cuz it will drain too much of their energy.
You know, the record companies are the one who plans all the distribution of the albums, their printing, they need to manage the money, they do some marketing for the band and they're the one who deals with the legal issues.
Let's just say it will be too much troubles for the advantages of having their own record label
|
|
|
|
Post by karro on Aug 11, 2004 19:27:12 GMT -5
If fat mike does I don't know why mc couldnt be able to.  The M*C guys have surnatural powers at all! |
|
|
|
Post by millencoolin2 on Aug 12, 2004 15:41:42 GMT -5
millencolin have autonomy (and fans) to record in their own label ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by fUx0r on Aug 13, 2004 2:53:11 GMT -5
i hope they stick with BH/epitaph... it just feels right.
|
|
|
|
Post by dainbramage on Aug 13, 2004 8:30:07 GMT -5
Also think they should stay with BHR/Epitaph.
I like Burning Heart, lots of great bands are signed to them, and their mailorder is very good.
|
|
|
|
Post by montego on Aug 16, 2004 13:05:50 GMT -5
I like bhr/epitaph, they area good labels
|
|
|
|
Post by montego on Aug 16, 2004 13:07:09 GMT -5
I like bhr/epitaph, they area good labels
|
|
|
|
Post by androdaking on Aug 18, 2004 11:00:56 GMT -5
Marveric Records: Madonna's own music label cause I know Nikola workship her. Who knows if she didnt send naked pics of her just like she did with Rancid? Will Nikola resist to? I don't it's called workship, I think it's called worship. And did she really do that to rancid? |
|
|
|
Post by androdaking on Aug 18, 2004 11:24:18 GMT -5
Now I've read that the madonna - rancid thingie was fake. it was just a picture not a naked one.
|
|
|
|
Post by karro on Aug 18, 2004 19:32:13 GMT -5
You just break all my fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by kaffia on Aug 20, 2004 4:17:23 GMT -5
Also think they should stay with BHR/Epitaph. I like Burning Heart, lots of great bands are signed to them, and their mailorder is very good. they are closing down the mailorder..  i think they should start their own label and sign Drowsy! |
|
